Welcome to Emissions Guide
Regulatory Framework For Air Emissions Article
. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.
Understanding Carbon Credit For Emissions Reduction Programs
from:Basically the carbon credit for emissions reduction programs are a way to cap or limit the amount of carbon in the form of greenhouse gases that industries can produce. Carbon, in the form of greenhouse gases, is largely produced in the industrial nations of the world but has become more prevalent in many of the developing nations. One reason for this is that coal and other oil based fuels are less expensive than alternative fuels, resulting in a lower cost of production for these companies but an accompanying higher production of harmful carbon.
Carbon credit for emissions reduction programs or schemes came about as a way for national and international industries and organizations to control the amount of fossil fuel emissions in some type of standardized way. The terms of the agreement were set in the Kyoto Protocol and then further refined and determined in the later Marrakesh Accords, with allocations for carbon credit for emissions reduction included in the agreement. Each country is allowed so many carbon credits, which are equivalent to acceptable fossil fuel emissions. The individual countries that signed off on the Kyoto Protocol then allocate the total carbon credits within their various industries. Each country manages each own credit allocation that is different based on the types and amount of industry. After the allocation is made to the plant, manufacturing organization or business, the company is then responsible for staying within the quota allocated by their own government. The carbon credit for emissions reduction program provides a type of trade program that different industries and companies can trade extra, unused carbon credit for emissions reduction within their facility, to another company that is getting close to over-using their limit.
Through this program the stabilization of the use of carbon credit for emissions reduction is proving to have a great deal of positive impact on the amount of greenhouse gases. Companies that use less than their allocated carbon credits are able to trade in their efficiency for real profit, whereas the companies that are not staying within the guidelines are required to pay more for their inefficiency in production. Although some companies are still producing more carbon, overall there is a balance internationally of production of carbon.
The only issues with using the carbon credit for emissions reduction program developed through the Kyoto Protocol is that it has not been accepted or implemented by many of the leading carbon emissions producing countries. Some countries have also included a stage type implementation of the Protocol and are just now adapting full use of the carbon credit program.
Regulatory Framework For Air Emissions Specific links
Regulatory Framework For Air Emissions News
LCQ2: Electricity tariffs of two power companies - 7thSpace Interactive (press release)
LCQ2: Electricity tariffs of two power companies 7thSpace Interactive (press release) In addition, improvements were made to the SCAs in many other aspects, for example, in encouraging the use of renewable energy, tightening the cap on the Tariff Stabilisation Fund (TSF) balances, introducing a new emissions performance linkage ... |
EPA Carbon Standard Takes a Bite out of Pollution - Center For American Progress
 Center For American Progress | EPA Carbon Standard Takes a Bite out of Pollution Center For American Progress A report by the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences estimates that the health cost of air pollution from coal electricity generation is $62 billion annually. A 2011 study in the New York Academy of Sciences by the late Dr. |
Energy And Environment Update -- May 20, 2012 - JD Supra (press release)
Energy And Environment Update -- May 20, 2012 JD Supra (press release) Congress Air Rules Delay Passes House CommitteeMay 20, 2012 Page 2 The House Energy and Commerce Committee approved legislation (HR 4471) May 17 that would delay three Environmental Protection Agency air pollution regulations, clearing the bill for ... |
Sovereignty Over Airspace: International Law, Current Challenges, and Future ... - Student Pulse
Sovereignty Over Airspace: International Law, Current Challenges, and Future ... Student Pulse In the first part the concept of sovereignty under general international law is briefly explained, before defining it in the more specific framework of public international air law. This discussion is followed by an analysis of the way states open ... |
Viewpoint: Why We Are Opposed to Shale Gas for Europe - NorthcentralPa.com
Viewpoint: Why We Are Opposed to Shale Gas for Europe NorthcentralPa.com This characterises how shale gas is being promoted at the European level: obvious loopholes in current regulatory frameworks are glossed over, and the true environmental and economic costs of shale gas, and the financial viability of the industry, ... |