Welcome to Environmental Pollution Guide
Environmental Pollution Laws Article
. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.
Information On Environmental Pollution: Does Greenpeace Deliver?
from:Solid information on environmental pollution can be difficult to find. For one, good information on environmental pollution is frequently too technical to be of any use to anyone outside of the academy, or anyone not planning on devoting their life to understanding all of the technical issues and chemical factors that make up the environment and our relation to it as human beings. For another, good information on environmental pollution is also frequently too local in its focus to be of any use to anyone not from that area. Sure, it may be interesting that desert caves in Libya are experiencing accelerated erosion as a result of magnesium deposits in nearby oases. But what does that have to do with us?
Yet it's a given that we need good information on environmental pollution in order to live in the modern world. The war to protect the environment is everyone's war; the environment itself is everyone's battleground. Greenpeace, despite the name, is one of the organizations that uses military metaphors as a central piece of their public relations strategy. Greenpeace positions themselves as a group of "Rainbow Warriors", dedicated to protecting the planet from its oppressors at any costs. And through their media and public outreach wings, Greenpeace positions itself as a solid source of information on environmental pollution.
But is this really the case? Is Greenpeace solely motivated by the need to deliver solid information on environmental pollution to the public at large? Or does it have another agenda--one which would lead it to distort even the facts it has sworn to protect?
Since its inception Greenpeace has been a political entity. The organization came to prominence by protesting nuclear weapons testing in Alaska--surely a political issue if there ever was one. Once the group became seaborne with the purchase of their famous flagship, the "Rainbow Warrior", they quickly became infamous in Japanese whaling circles for their deliberate interference in whaling options--an act that led to their branding as "eco-terrorists" by the Japanese government.
None of this in and of itself would make Greenpeace's information suspicious: after all, many organizations have done worse and still provided reliable information to the public. But in a recent article that appeared in the Wall Street Journal, Patrick Moore, one of the co-founders of Greenpeace spoke out against increasing politicization within the Greenpeace movement, taking as his evidence their 1986 campaign against chlorine use, and their ongoing campaign against phthalate compounds used in children's toys. According to Moore, both chemicals are perfectly safe, and are being used by Greenpeace as "hot button" issues to alarm people--and to drum up political capital for Greenpeace.
There's no immediate reason to trust Mr. Moore over his former partners, of course--which is the problem. In the politics of environmentalism, it's difficult to know who to trust--and the arcane scientific journals may be the only source of rock-solid information on environmental pollution we have, even if it remains a bitter and hard-to-swallow drink.
Environmental Pollution Laws Specific links
Environmental Pollution Laws News
Party-list solon to probe Caraga mining firms’ compliance to environmental laws
BUTUAN CITY—Ako Bikol Rep. Rodel Batocabe on Thursday said he was seeking an investigation on the reported violation of environmental and health hazard laws, and nonpayment of taxes by four large-scale mining firms based in the Caraga region. Batocabe said that on Tuesday, he filed House Resolution No. 2124 for an investigation into the compliance [...]
Read more...Stricter Quebec environmental laws in effect Wednesday
Quebec’s Environment Department says new penalties that come into effect Wednesday will help protect the province’s waterways, forests, wetlands and natural areas from pollution.
Read more...UP settles pollution case with federal regulators
UP settles pollution case with federal regulators By JUDY FAHYS The Salt Lake Tribune Published Feb 9, 2012 03:54PM MDT Union Pacific Railroad Co. has agreed to pay $1.5 million for pollution violations at its facilities in Utah and two other states. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said Thursday the case involves operations at 20 rail yards in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming, along with oil ...
Read more...Union Pacific settles pollution case with federal regulators
Union Pacific settles pollution case with federal regulators By JUDY FAHYS The Salt Lake Tribune Published Feb 9, 2012 03:54PM MDT Union Pacific Railroad Co. has agreed to pay $1.5 million for pollution violations at its facilities in Utah and two other states. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said Thursday the case involves operations at 20 rail yards in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming ...
Read more...Elyria Foundry fined $155,000 for air pollution violations
ELYRIA — The Elyria Foundry has agreed to pay the Ohio EPA a $155,000 penalty as a settlement for violating Ohio’s air pollution control laws.
Read more...